It's a Trap! Erdogan Trying to Use Refugee Crisis to Lure NATO Into Mideast
On Monday, German media reported that Chancellor
Angela Merkel and her Turkish counterpart, Prime Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu, had agreed on a 10-point action plan aimed at dealing
with the refugee crisis affecting Europe, in addition to Brussels'
existing €3 billion commitment, Sputnik reported.
Possibly the most controversial of the measures
outlined in the strategy is Ankara's plan to get NATO to use its forces
to "monitor" Turkey's coastal borders on the Aegean Sea – the main body
of water used by migrant smugglers to take refugees from the Middle East
to Europe.
Commenting on the action plan, and on the
impending NATO defense ministers' meeting discussing the issue, Gareth
Jenkins, an Istanbul-based researcher and Turkey expert with the Silk
Road Studies Program at Johns Hopkins University, told Radio Sputnik
that Ankara's attempts to lure NATO into the Aegean and the Middle East
is dangerous and unrealistic, to put it mildly.
With a NATO meeting on the issue scheduled
for Wednesday and Thursday, Jenkins noted it's still not clear "exactly
what Turkey wants NATO to do, and even the people in NATO are not clear
[on] what Turkey is demanding."
Normally, "what happens in this situation is that
before there's a public statement, privately a NATO country will tell
the other NATO members what it has in mind, and Turkey hasn't done that.
At the moment the NATO officials in Brussels are as much in the dark
as the rest of us."
Moreover, with his interviewer recalling Ankara's
attempts to call on NATO following the incident involving the Turkish
downing of a Russian Su-24 jet over Syria late last year, the researcher
admitted that "there are certainly concerns in NATO at the moment that
Turkey is going to try to use the refugee crisis…to [somehow] get NATO
to get more involved in the region to bolster its position
against Russia."
As for the plan's point on increasing Turkish
cooperation with European border authority Frontex, Jenkins noted that
that too is problematic, given Turkey's refusal to recognize EU member
Cyprus. "Quite how that cooperation will work in practice is really
unclear," the analyst said.
Moreover, Jenkins recalled, there's also the issue
of what to do with the refugees that get picked up by NATO ships, were
they to be deployed to the area. "If NATO becomes involved and refugees
are taken onto NATO ships, what happens next? What do they do with the
refugees? NATO ships don't really have any authority to keep the
refugees, and who would they return them to?"
Ultimately, the expert suggested, what "really
what happened with this meeting is that Merkel and Davutoglu passed the
buck, and now the decision is going to be made at the NATO meeting
in Brussels…" NATO's response, Jenkins noted, will depend entirely "on
what [the Turkish] request will be in detail."
In any case, he noted, the €3 billion promised
to Ankara by Brussels last year still hasn't arrived, and had been
blocked by internal EU issues until just last week.
"But even if the money comes: I've talked to a lot
of Syrian refugees here in Turkey and most of them are still going
to try to get into Europe regardless of whether the money comes.
Actually, [even if] 3 billion euros sounds like a lot of money, there
are at least 2.5 million refugees in Turkey and when you break it
down to how much money that is per refugee it's not a lot of money."
Pointing out that he has observed a growing strain
in Turkish attitudes toward refugees on the ground in recent months,
Jenkins emphasized that ultimately, only a resolution to the ongoing
military conflict in Syria will be able to resolve the refugee crisis
for both Turkey and Europe.
"I don't think there's any question that the real
solution to the refugee problem lies in sorting out what's happening
in Syria and putting an end to the civil war. These other discussions
aren't going to solve the essential problem," the analyst concluded.
0 comments:
Post a Comment